Brought to you by AG Concepts

Tuesday, May 10, 2016

Processors active at the saleyard. Are margins improving?

By Matt Dalgleish  |  Source: MLA, NLRS, ACA, USDA, Steiner, ABS, Trade

Key points

  • The percentage of purchases of EYCI style cattle going to processors has increased over April to sit at 21% of total saleyard turnover.
  • The processor margin for April has narrowed to a loss of $12.85 per head.
  • The 2016 season will be a testing time for processors as the herd expansion phase of the cattle cycle is likely to impact upon their bottom line.

2016-05-10 Cattle Fig1

2016-05-10 Cattle Fig2

2016-05-10 Cattle Fig3

The recent dip in the Eastern Young Cattle Indicator (EYCI) to 545.25¢/kg cwt and an improving 90CL export price appears to have stirred processors into action at the saleyards with the underlying EYCI data showing an increase in processor purchases during April. Does this mean processor margins are on the improve too after two months of registering negative returns?

Figure 1 highlights the percentage of saleyard purchases of EYCI style cattle that are bought by processors and while it doesn’t give us a picture of the off saleyard purchase activity it still provides a glimpse of processor demand. The 2016 pattern shows rather subdued processor interest during February and March which coincided with the Mecardo theoretical processor margin cut out model registering negative returns.

The cut out model uses beef export prices to derive a total “cow value” from all of the component parts which can be used to subtract cost of purchase and processing costs in order to calculate a theoretical processor margin. To find out more about the processor margin cut out model click here.

The lift in percentage processor purchases during April to reach levels comparable to this time last season of 21% suggests that conditions for processor margins have improved over the month. Indeed, as outlined in figure 2 the negative processor margins recorded during February and March have narrowed according to the cut out model. The processor margin for April sits at a fairly slim loss of $12.85 per head.

As the cut out model is a theoretical tool designed to represent the average processor, providing a snapshot view of the current trading environment for processors, it is feasible that more efficient processors are in positive margin territory.

The average margin for the 2016 season currently sits at a loss of $26.90 per head. Figure 3 plots the average yearly margin against the annual cow slaughter numbers since 2000 and there is a fairly strong positive correlation between processor margins and the female kill. Generally speaking, higher female slaughter numbers correspond to higher processor margins and this is due to the fact that cow slaughter is higher during times of herd liquidation and lower in times of herd expansion.

The herd liquidation phase is synonymous with unfavourable weather conditions such as drought, high feed prices and the increased turnoff of cattle, including cows, which corresponds to lower cattle prices and expanding processor margins. In contrast, abundant grass, low feed prices, robust cattle prices, and an optimistic outlook combine to entice producers into herd expansion, thereby holding onto breeding stock. Lower cow turnoff usually signals a tougher trading environment for processors and tighter margins.

What does this mean?

As highlighted in figure 3 the average processor margin for the current season plotted against the Meat and Livestock Australia (MLA) cow slaughter forecast for this year shows that the 2016 data point is sitting very close to the expected trend line (orange line). Given the available data, this trend line represents a line of best fit and allows us to anticipate how the current season will unfold for processors.

This suggests processors that do not have efficient economies of scale and effective methods to keep their production costs under control will find the 2016 season a challenging trading environment. 

Mecardo information is provided to assist in your marketing decisions. It contains a range of data and views on the current market. It is not intended to constitute advice for a specific purpose. Before taking any action in relation to information contained within this report, you should seek advice from a qualified professional. The information is obtained from a variety of sources and neither Mecardo nor Ag Concepts Advisory will be held liable for any loss or damage whatsoever that may arise from the use of information or for any error or mis-statement contained in this report. 

x

Sign up for a FREE BASIC SUBSCRIPTION now to read this article.

Mecardo will send you its latest market analysis outlook delivered to your Inbox as it's published.  You will also receive one month Premium access for free.

You tell us what information you want to hear about, so you'll only be alerted to information that is relevant to you.

Learn more about Mecardo Sign Up Now!